)
Do human embryos replay the evolutionary history of their species as they develop? This idea was disproved 130 years ago, but evolutionists have re-packaged it and keeping bringing it up as supposed evidence for evolution. This idea has led many to believe that what is growing in a woman's womb is merely an animal that can be conveniently disposed of in its fish stage. Countless people have been convinced by the wonders of the developing embryo—falsely portrayed—that evolution must be true. Why is this falsified idea still accepted by many teachers and scientists? The above clip is taken from Dr. Hovind's Lies in the Textbooks seminar.Also See
- Common arguments for evolution that have been rejected http://creation.com/appendix-1-common-arguments-for-evolution-that-have-been-rejected
- Recapitulation Repackaged and Re-Applied http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v8/n1/recapitulation-repackaged
- Fraud rediscovered http://creation.com/fraud-rediscovered
- Something Fish About Gill Slits http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/03/14/fishy-gill-slits
- Ernst Haeckel - Evangelist for evolution and apostle of deceit http://creation.com/ernst-haeckel-evangelist-for-evolution-and-apostle-of-deceit
- Limb Design Homology http://creation.com/limb-design-homology
From Evolutionists
- There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: implications for current theories of evolution http://www.oeb.harvard.edu/faculty/hanken/documents/Richardson%20et%20al%201997%20Anat%20Embryol.pdf
- Embryonic fraud lives on, New Scientist 155(2098):23, 6 September 1997 http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg15520984.700-embryonic-fraud-lives-on.html
- Elizabeth Pennisi, Haeckel’s Embryos: Fraud Rediscovered, Science 277(5331):1435, 5 September 1997 http://www.ichthus.info/Evolution/DOCS/Richardson2.pdf