Showing posts with label RNA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RNA. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 5, 2024

The Impossible Problem of the Origin of Life - Dr. Don Batten


People all over the world are taught that everything in nature—including life itself—is the result of purely natural processes. Is this right? Did life form itself? Is that even possible? What would it take? What ingredients would the simplest, self-replicating life need? Or are people being misled—in the name of ‘science’? Join biologist Dr Don Batten for a discussion of the origin of life. Learn why the very laws of chemistry dictate that life could never form itself—not even in a trillion years! ⏳ TIMESTAMPS ⌛ 00:00 Teaser 00:27 Introduction: The impossible problem of the origin of life 01:54 What ingredients do we need to form life? 02:14 → Amino acids 03:18 → Sugars 03:46 → Nucleic acids (DNA & RNA) 04:10 → Lipids 05:03 Problem: The ingredients don’t play well together! 05:11 → The conditions needed for amino acids are the wrong conditions for sugars 05:41 → Necessary metallic ions wreak havoc with necessary lipids 06:33 → High energy compounds (e.g. lipids) are unlikely to form in the same ‘soup’ as low energy compounds (e.g. sugars) 06:54 Problem: Chirality (or ‘handedness’) – Amino acids must only be left-handed, sugars must only be right-handed 09:01 Problem: The origin of coded information (DNA) in living things 09:36 → How could an encoding/decoding system arise by chance? 10:59 → The genetic code is optimised – and that's not possible without pre-planning 11:28 → The sheer volume of genetic information needed for the ‘simplest’ life is overwhelming 13:15 → Multiple, complex cellular ‘machines’ are needed for the information system to work at all 14:04 Would Darwin be a Darwinist today? 14:46 Problem: Probability shows the impossibility of the chance origin of even a single protein 19:10 Solution: How did life come about? 19:26 → The need for a super intelligent Designer 21:03 → Why is this such an unpopular conclusion? 21:24 Why should the Designer be the God of the Bible? 22:32 Where to get more information on origin-of-life problems ✍️ LINKS AND SHOW NOTES • Origin of Life – https://creation.com/origin-of-life • 15 loopholes in the evolutionary theory of the origin of life – https://creation.com/loopholes-in-the... • Origin of Life Q&A – https://creation.com/origin-of-life-q... • Why the Miller–Urey research argues against abiogenesis – https://creation.com/why-the-miller-u... • Origin of First Life: Chemical Evolution vs Real Chemistry –    • Origin of First Life: Chemical Evolut...   • Would Darwin be a Darwinist today? – https://creation.com/would-darwin-be-... 📚 HELPFUL RESOURCES • The Stairway to Life (book) – https://creation.com/s/10-2-671 • Chemicals to Living Cells (streaming video) – https://creation.com/s/35-8-530 • Evolution Impossible (book) – https://creation.com/s/10-2-643 • An Industrial Chemist's Origin of Life Cookbook (audio) – https://creation.com/s/35-1-033 💙 SOCIAL MEDIA ► Facebook:   / creationministries   ► TikTok:   / creationministries   ► Instagram:   / creationministries   ► X / Twitter:   / creationnews   ► eNewsletter: https://creation.com/infobytes 📅 EVENTS We present at hundreds of events around the world each year. To see what events are happening near you, or to request a creation presentation in your Church (or other gathering) visit: https://creation.com/events

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Cellular Complexity - Dr. Georgia Purdom



Contemporaries to Charles Darwin, Thomas H. Huxley and Ernst Haeckel wrote about the idea that cells were essentially simple and formed as Darwin wrote "in some warm little pond". Review http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/tj/v18/n2/abiogenesis. With better microscopes and scientific experimentation we have come to see a whole world of complexity within the cell. The complex cell is in many ways like a city.

In this video, Jim Bendewald interviews Dr. Georgia Purdom on staff with Answers in Genesis. The discussion includes a fascinating look at the various organelles and functions of the cell. In addition to the interview are wonderful illustrations using animated graphics. In this video you will see for yourself the immense complexity built into our cells. While evolution predicts simplicity and requires simplicity, the reality is the cells contain unfathomable complexity inferring design as the best explanation.





Georgia Purdom, Ph.D., molecular genetics, Ohio State University

AiG-US speaker and researcher

Dr. Georgia Purdom is a compelling and dynamic lecturer and well qualified to speak on the relevance of Genesis to the issue of biblical authority. She is the only female Ph.D. scientist engaged in full-time speaking and research for a biblical creationist organization in North America. Dr. Purdom states, “A proper understanding of Genesis is very important because it is foundational to biblical authority and a Christian worldview. It’s about so much more than the creation/evolution controversy. It’s about the truthfulness and authority of God’s Word.”

Education and Professional Experience

Dr. Purdom graduated with a Ph.D. in Molecular Genetics from Ohio State University in 2000. Her specialty is cellular and molecular biology. Dr. Purdom’s graduate work focused on genetic regulation of factors important for bone remodeling. She has published papers in the Journal of Neuroscience (under her maiden name Hickman), the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research and the Journal of Leukocyte Biology. She is a member of the American Society for Microbiology and American Society for Cell Biology. Following graduation, Dr. Purdom served as a professor of biology for six years at Mount Vernon Nazarene University in Ohio.

Research Interests

Dr. Purdom is a member of the Creation Research Society and serves on the editorial board and executive council of BSG: A Creation Biology Study Group. She serves as a peer reviewer for Answers Research Journal and Creation Research Science Quarterly. Dr. Purdom along with Dr. Joseph Francis of Master’s College are co-founders of the Microbe Forum. This forum sponsors research, collaboration, and conferences in the field of creation microbiology.
Dr. Purdom’s scientific research focuses on the roles of natural selection and mutation in microbial populations. She seeks to understand the original, created, “very good” roles of bacteria in the pre-Fall world and genetic mechanisms that have led to their adaptations and pathogenicity in a post-Fall world. She has presented her research in this field at two Microbe Forum conferences and the 2008 International Conference on Creationism. Dr. Purdom also has published papers in the 2008 Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism and Answers Research Journal. In addition, she has numerous lay-friendly and semi-technical articles in Answers magazine and on the AiG website.
Dr. Purdom’s expertise in natural selection was crucial in her design of the “Natural Selection Is Not Evolution” exhibit at the Creation Museum. She is also interested in studying the formation of stromatolites, animal speciation after the Flood, and the Intelligent Design Movement.

Speaking Interests

Dr. Purdom describes herself as a “teacher at heart” and this is clearly displayed in her presentations. As a former biology professor, she has the experience necessary to make scientific concepts understandable to a wide variety of people. Dr. Purdom has both general and in-depth presentations. She is a regular speaker in the Creation Museum Speaker Series and has spoken at many AiG conferences.
Dr. Purdom also has a passion to help women understand the importance of Genesis for their roles as wives and mothers and is an excellent choice to speak to women’s groups. As a wife and mother herself she has a vested interest in understanding what Genesis has to say to women.

Dr. Purdom’s DVDs:

Dr. Purdom’s DVDs in production (available in 2009-2010)

  • Wonder of the Cell
  • Genetics, Evolution, and Creation: Most Asked Questions
  • All Creatures Great and Small: Microbes and Creation
  • Hope Amid Despair: The Legacy of Eve (for women)

Dr. Purdom’s general presentations:

  • Is Genesis Relevant in Today’s World?
  • Only One Race: The Biblical Answer to Racism
  • Biblical Authority and the Six Days of Creation
  • The Power of Creation Evangelism
  • Why is There So Much Pain and Suffering in the World?
  • Wonder of the Cell
  • The Code of Life: DNA, Information, and Mutation
  • My Plans, God’s Detours (personal testimony)

Dr. Purdom’s in-depth presentations:

  • The Intelligent Design Movement: How Intelligent Is It?
  • Genetics, Evolution, and Creation: Most Asked Questions
  • All Creatures Great and Small: Microbes and Creation

Dr. Purdom’s presentations for women audiences:

  • Hope Amid Despair: The Legacy of Eve
  • What’s the Big Deal? Why God’s Word Matters From the Very Beginning
  • Fighting Truth Decay: Bringing the Bible to Life
  • Why? Answering Life’s Toughest Questions About God and Suffering
  • The Biblical Answer to Racism Meets Motherhood
  • My Plans, God’s Detours (personal testimony)

Monday, December 30, 2013

Unlocking the Mystery of Life



Illustra Media

In 1859, Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species. In it, he argued that all of life on earth was the product of undirected natural processes: Time, chance, and natural selection. Since Darwin, biologists have relied on such processes to account for the origin of living things. Yet today, this approach is being challenged as never before.

Unlocking the Mystery of Life tells the story of contemporary scientists who are advancing a powerful but controversial idea—the theory of intelligent design.

Unlocking is the product of more than three years of research, photography, and post production. Based upon the scholarly work of Stephen C. Meyer, Michael Behe, William Dembski and others, this documentary presents the scientific case for intelligent design based upon recent discoveries in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.


The film was photographed throughout the United States in 2001 and 2002. Location photography also took place in the Galapagos Islands at the site of Charles Darwin’s seminal 1835 expedition.
Unlocking is highlighted by computer animation that depicts the inner-workings of the living cell. Animator Tim Doherty created sequences illustrating the structure and operations of the cell nucleus, the DNA molecule, protein molecules, and the bacterial flagellar motor.

After its release is September 2003, Unlocking the Mystery of Life aired on PBS. The show was broadcast on more than 40 affiliates throughout the United States. The cancellation of a scheduled broadcast on station KNME in Albequerque, New Mexico triggered national news coverage and a debate over PBS programming decisions.

Unlocking the Mystery of Life has been translated into more than 25 languages including Russian, Mandarin, and Spanish. It is distributed throughout Asia, Europe, South America, Australia, Canada, and the United States. North American distribution is supervised by Randolf Productions International.

In addition to the 67-minute feature documentary, the English DVD version includes almost an hour of bonus features.
http://www.unlockingthemysteryoflife.com/

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Shared mutations in the human and chimpanzee β-globin pseudogenes is not evidence for a common ancestor - Bryan Anderson

The article below appeared in the April 2011 Journal of Creation, Volume 25, Issue 1
The PDF is free to download here.

Shared mutations in the human and chimpanzee β-globin pseudogenes is not evidence for a common ancestor


by Bryan Anderson

Evolutionists have often postulated that there are ‘shared mutations’ in pseudogenes (supposedly defective genes) from different baramins (biblical kinds) and that this is conclusive evidence that the different baramins share a common ancestor. Consequently, this postulation appears to falsify biblical creation in favor of evolution. This argument is so convincing because a similar argument is used in other non-biological fields to prove a common source for two pieces of information. For example, two similar written articles can be compared to identify plagiarism, by searching for unusual spelling errors that appear in both articles. If unusual spelling errors are identified, this is compelling evidence that one of the authors has copied the other’s article, or that both of the authors have copied another author’s article.

Evolutionists have suggested that the β-globin pseudogenes in humans and chimpanzees contain shared mutations and they have used this idea to conclude humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor.1 Despite the recent discoveries that some pseudogenes actually have a function,2 the apparent β-globin pseudogenes and their so-called shared mutations are still being used as evidence for a common ancestor for humans and chimpanzees in the current literature.3 This conclusion is incompatible with biblical creation since the Bible says that humans and the ancestors of chimpanzees were created separately.

Human and chimpanzee β-globin gene clusters

 

Globin genes code for the predominate proteins in red blood cells—hemoglobin. It binds and transports oxygen from the lungs to cells throughout the body. Hemoglobin is needed because oxygen dissolves poorly in the blood plasma. Humans carry nine globin genes, which are all slightly different to each other. Five of these genes are clustered together in a region of DNA called the ‘β-globin gene cluster’, which is located on chromosome 11 in humans (figure 1). These genes are not all switched on at the same time but in stages, corresponding to their position on the chromosome and the different stages of human development.

The β-globin pseudogene in humans is located in the β-globin gene cluster, between the γ-A and the δ-globin genes (figure 1). There are two copies of the γ-globin genes, called γ-A and -G. The β-globin pseudogene shows higher similarity to the γ-globin gene, but is called the β-globin pseudogene because it was originally identified by comparing it to the β-globin gene of rabbits.4 Chimpanzees have the same globin genes in the same order, including the β-globin pseudogene.

Apparent genetic defects in the β-globin pseudogenes

 

Evolutionists hypothesized several point mutations and deletions in the β-globin pseudogenes of humans and chimpanzees and these differences render these regions incapable of being translated (figure 1). The start codon (a codon is a sequence of three adjacent nucleotides constituting the genetic code) of the human β-globin pseudogene has two apparent point mutations which prevents the protein-synthesizing machinery (ribosome) identifying it as a gene. A point mutation has been suggested in humans at codon 15 that signals the ribosome to prematurely terminate synthesis of the protein (premature stop codon). At codons 20 and 145 in humans it has been suggested that there are deletions of 1 bp. The first deletion messes up the code of the gene, resulting in six stop codons in the exons downstream, and the second scrambles a correct stop codon at the end of the pseudogene. These same hypothesized defects are found at the same position on the chimpanzee chromosome. In addition to the theoretical predictions, scientists have not detected any evidence using wet laboratory techniques that these pseudogenes in humans or chimpanzees are translated.4

Figure 1.
Figure 1. The organization of the β-globin gene cluster in humans and an expanded view of the β-globin pseudogene, showing the ‘defects’. The first (horizontal) track displays the position on the chromosome (in bp). The second track is a diagrammatic illustration of the organization of β-globin gene cluster. Arrows indicate the direction of the genes. The bottom bar is an expanded view of the β-globin pseudogene. The white boxes are introns.

Interesting findings about the β-globin pseudogenes

There are three interesting findings about the β-globin pseudogenes from humans and chimpanzees. Firstly, when the pseudogenes from human and chimpanzee are aligned and analyzed for differences they are almost identical.1 The high level of similarity is not only seen in the exons of these pseudogenes, but also in the regions immediately upstream of the first exons (promoters and 5’ untranslated regions), between (introns), and immediately downstream of third exons (3’ untranslated regions). These regions have only 31 bp that are different. Secondly, there are putative promoters located upstream of these pseudogenes that are almost identical, with only 1 bp of the 15 bp TATA- and CAAT-like boxes that is different in humans and chimpanzees.1 The TATA- and CAAT-like boxes of the human β-globin pseudogene are located at nucleotides -25 and -81, respectively. The transcription initiation site is numbered as the +1 position and nucleotides upstream are numbered with negative integers. The human β-globin pseudogene TATA-like box has the sequence of TAAAAA and the CAAT-like box has the sequence GGTCAATAG. Normally, TATA and CAAT boxes are centered at nucleotides -25 and -80, respectively, with the consensus TATAAA and GGCCAATCT. Therefore, the TATA- and CAAT-like boxes of the human β-globin pseudogene are located at the correct positions and are only 1 and 3 bp, respectively, from the consensus sequence. Finally, the predicted intron junctions of the pseudogenes obey the ‘GU/AG RNA splicing rule’1 (‘RNA splicing’ is the modification of an RNA transcript, in which the transcript is cut at the intron junctions; the introns are then removed and the exons are spliced together).

Evolutionists have shown little interest in these findings about the β-globin pseudogenes. This is because they have assumed that these pseudogenes are just more nonfunctional junk DNA. Evolutionists believe the DNA of more complex organisms, such as primates, must consist of mainly junk,5 so finding pseudogenes within the β-globin gene clusters is unsurprising to them. In addition to this, scientists may have detected that two exons of the β-globin pseudogene in humans are transcribed into non-coding RNA (ncRNA).6-8 However, this possible finding has been largely ignored by the scientific community, again because of the assumption that this region is a pseudogene. Some evolutionists prematurely dismiss this finding as merely noise in their wet laboratory results. They assume that many of the RNA transcripts detected in humans, primates and the other more complex organisms are because of the limitations of the current techniques and equipment used. Therefore, they have concluded these regions are not transcribed to RNA.9
 

Discussion

 

The fact that these β-globin pseudogenes in humans and chimpanzees are almost identical suggests that they either (1) have not been copied in each organism from generation to generation for the past five million years, (2) the entire regions, including the promoters, 5’ untranslated regions, introns and 3’ untranslated regions are functionally constrained and must remain almost identical, or (3) they have been transferred from chimpanzees to humans or vice versa, recently. The first suggestion is consistent with the Creation hypothesis. The second is unlikely, because Sanford has shown that natural selection cannot maintain the integrity of human DNA for so long.10 The third suggestion is also unlikely because there is no evidence in nature that large amounts of genetic material can be transferred between humans and chimpanzees. Consequently, the fact that high rates of mutations are not seen and that these regions are almost identical suggests they are young. Hence, this reduction in time for the existence of human and chimpanzee organisms makes it highly improbable they evolved from a common ancestor.

Based on the above evidence and our present understanding of genetics, the best hypothesis for these regions is that they function to remove the γ-globin RNA transcripts. As stated earlier in this article, subsets of globin genes are switched on and off according to the order on the chromosome, and their order correlates to the different stages of development. At the birth of a human infant, the γ-globin genes are significantly down-regulated and the β-globin gene is significantly up-regulated, with normal adult levels reached for each gene by the end of the first year of the infant’s life. The ncRNA transcripts from these pseudogenes may bind with ncRNA transcripts partners that are mirror images to the pseudogene transcripts, these transcripts are known as ‘antisense transcripts’. The pair of transcripts is then cut up, a process known as ‘dicing’, and the RNA fragments are used to direct degradation machinery to the γ-RNA transcripts. This process is known as ‘RNA induced RNA silencing’. Thus cellular levels of the γ-RNA transcripts are decreased. Although, the γ-globin genes may have their own antisense transcripts, a third antisense transcript would amplify the process of γ-globin RNA transcript removal.


This hypothesis is supported by the following facts. That in humans and chimpanzees;
  1. Since TATA- and CAAT-like boxes have been identified upstream of these regions, these regions may be transcriptionally active;
  2. the predicted intron junctions obey the GU/AG rule, therefore, suggesting that splicing would occur if these regions were transcribed;
  3. all three exons have at least one stop codon;
  4. these regions are similar to the γ-globin genes; and
  5. these regions are located between the γ-A and the β-globin genes.
In addition to this, transcripts may have been detected for the second and third exons, in humans. Finally, scientists have identified a pseudogene in mice that codes for an antisense transcript. Once this antisense transcript is bound to its cognate transcript, it is diced and then used to induce silencing.11 Although this phenomenon in mice is somewhat different, it does add support for the above hypothesis.

Thus, evolutionists have somewhat prematurely concluded that these regions in humans and chimpanzees are genuine pseudogenes (i.e. former genes deactivated by mutations) and that there are shared mutations in these regions. Whatever the reason for these pseudogenes, there is a lack of evidence in these regions to suggest that humans and chimpanzees have a common ancestor.

Related Articles

Further Reading

References

  1. Chang, L.Y. and Slightom, J.L., Isolation and nucleotide sequence analysis of the β-type globin pseudogene from human, gorilla and chimpanzee, J. Mol. Biol. 180:767–784, 1984. Return to text.
  2. Sasidharan, R. and Gerstein, M., Genomics: protein fossils live on as RNA, Nature 453:729–731, 2008. Return to text.
  3. Miller, K.R., Only a Theory: Evolution and the Battle for America’s Soul, Penguin, New York, 2009. Return to text.
  4. Fritsch, E.F., Lawn, R.M. and Maniatis, T., Molecular cloning and characterization of the human β-like globin gene cluster, Cell 19:959–972, 1980. Return to text.
  5. ReMine, W.J., The Neutral Theory of Evolution; in: The Biotic Message: Evolution versus Message Theory, Saint Paul Science, Minnesota, MN, pp. 248–250, 1993. Return to text.
  6. Harrington, J J., Sherf, B., Rundlett, S. et al., Creation of genome-wide protein expression libraries using random activation of gene expression, Nat. Biotechnol. 19:440–445, 2001. Return to text.
  7. Kent, W.J., BLAT—the BLAST-like alignment tool, Genome Res. 12:56–64, 2002. Return to text.
  8. Hillier, L., Clark, N., Dubuque, T. et al., Unpublished work, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1995–1996. Return to text.
  9. Wang, J., Zhang, J., Zheng, H. et al., Mouse transcriptome: neutral evolution of ‘noncoding’ complementary DNAs, Nature 431:1–2, 2004. Return to text.
  10. Sanford, J.C., Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome, FMS Publications, Waterloo, NY, 2008. Return to text.
  11. Tam, O.H., Aravin, A.A., Stein, P. et al., Pseudogene-derived small interfering RNAs regulate gene expression in mouse oocytes, Nature 453:534–538, 2008. Return to text.

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Marvellous Molecular Machines | Creation Magazine LIVE! (2-12)




Through eye-popping computer animation, based on recent scientific discoveries, this week's episode explores amazing biological machines at work in our bodies.

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With
offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

The Dictionary of Life | Origins with Dr. Paul A. Nelson



Dr. Nelson breaks down some of the amazingly complex functions of the most simple cells. The simplest cell is to complex to have come from non-life or evolved.






Paul Nelson

Ph.D. Philosophy, University of Chicago

Paul Nelson is currently a Fellow of the Discovery Institute and Adjunct Professor in the MA Program in Science & Religion at Biola University. Paul’s articles have appeared in Biology & Philosophy, Zygon, Rhetoric and Public Affairs, and Touchstone, and chapters in the anthologies Mere Creation, Signs of Intelligence, Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics, and Darwin, Design, and Public Education. His forthcoming monograph, On Common Descent, critically evaluates the theory of common descent. Paul is a member of the Society for Developmental Biology (SDB) and the International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology (ISHPSSB). Paul is married to Suzanne Nelson, M.D., M.P.H., an assistant professor of pediatrics at Northwestern University; they reside in Glenview, Illinois (a suburb of Chicago) with their two daughters, Hannah (14) and Olivia (12).

Sunday, March 11, 2012

How did life originate? -15 Questions for Evolutionists - Q1 - Genesis Unleashed



1.How did life originate? Evolutionist Professor Paul Davies admitted, “Nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell.”1 

Andrew Knoll, professor of biology, Harvard, said, “we don’t really know how life originated on this planet”.2 

A minimal cell needs several hundred proteins. Even if every atom in the universe were an experiment with all the correct amino acids present for every possible molecular vibration in the supposed evolutionary age of the universe, not even one average-sized functional protein would form. So how did life with hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design? See: creation.com/loopholes.

 Creation Ministry International's '15 Questions for Evolutionists' flyer summarizes 15 major problems with evolution. Some evolutionists have attempted to answer the questions. In this episode Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss the question and the attempts to answer it.


Related content


References 1.Davies, Paul, Australian Centre for Astrobiology, Sydney, New Scientist 179(2403):32, 2003. Return to text. 2.Knoll, Andrew H., PBS Nova interview, How Did Life Begin? July 1, 2004. Return to text.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

The Atheist ODDS



The most compelling evidence is amino acids. The simplest known living organism has over 500 amino acids. When amino acids form, they are less than one-millionth the size of a human hair. When they form, they form with side groups of atoms. Scientist have found that all non-living amino acids form with 50% of side atoms on the right side of the acid and 50% on the left. This is true on all non-living amino acids. Living cells can ONLY contain amino acids on the left side. ALL amino acids found in every single living cell contains only left-sided amino acids. In the most favorable environment of scientific labs, this has never been duplicated. No scientist has ever created the left-handed amino acid that is critical to the formation of life. All amino acids always form with left and right sided atoms. If scientist in perfect conditions can't duplicate one single left-sided amino acid, how could the 500 necessary for life form by chance? The scientific odds of even one left-sided amino acid forming by chance is 10 to the 123rd power. In other words 1 chance in 10 followed by 123 zeros.

The Devastation of Evolution - Chirality (Evolution is a "Catastrophic Failure")



Read Charles McCombs, Ph.D. detailed article, Evolution Hopes You Don't Know Chemistry: The Problem with Chirality

This video and the article show the absolute impossibility that life could have arose from non-life. The video also shows how the Miller/Urey experiment, which created life from non-life in the lab according to the media, was a failure.

Dr. Charles McCombs, Ph.D. is a chemist and a Christian apologist. He holds two degrees: A Ph.D. in organic chemistry from UCLA, and a B.S. in chemistry from CSULB. Dr. McCombs uses his passion for chemistry to educate others, show proof that God created everything, and to further the kingdom of God.

Publications

Chemistry by Chance: A Formula for Non-Life by Charles McCombs, Ph.D., Acts & Facts Feb 1, 2009.
Evolution Hopes You Don't Know Chemistry: The Problem with Chirality by Charles McCombs, Ph.D., Acts & Facts May 1, 2004
Evolution Hopes You Don't Know Chemistry: The Problem of Control by Charles McCombs, Ph.D., Acts & Facts Aug 1, 2004
Cyanide -- An Ingredient for Life? by Charles McCombs, Ph.D. and Brian Thomas, M.S., Acts & Facts Nov 30, 2009

Education
Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry, University of California in Los Angeles: Westwood, CA, 1978.
B.S. in Chemistry, California State University in Long Beach: Long Beach, CA. Nominated for Phi Beta Kappa; 1973

Work History
1978-1998: Principal Research Chemist, Eastman Chemical Company; Kingsport, Tennessee
1998-2008: Teacher at West Charlotte Christian Academy
2008-2010: Associate Professor of Chemistry, Institute for Creation Research
2008-2010: Assistant Director, National Creation Science Foundation

Patents
-Method of preparing 11.beta., 17.alpha., 20, 21-tetrahydroxy steroids and corresponding 11.beta., 17.alpha., 21-trihydroxy-20-oxo steroids Charles A. McCombs, Charles T. Goodhue, Gwendolyn C. Kydd, Charles H. Foster, Filed February 6,1984
-Dehydroformylation of steroidal aldehydes Charles A. McCombs, Charles H. Foster, Filed August 14, 1980
-Organic compositions and their manufacture Charles A. McCombs, Filed August 28, 1989
-Preparation of 4-carboalkoxy-1,3-cyclohexanedione type compounds Charles A. McCombs, Filed February 24, 1989
-Process for preparing 17.alpha.-hydroxy-20-ketosteroids Charles A. McCombs, Filed March 16, 1981
-Extrusion of an admixture of a meltable binder and a food or drug Charles A. McCombs, Pierre Autant, Jacques Ruel, Stephen Weinhold, Ernest P. Smith, Stephen H. Wu, and Louis P. Hoskins, Filed June 21, 1991
-Process for preparing 9,11-unsaturated steroidal compound from the corresponding saturated steroidal compund Charles A. McCombs, John A. Hyatt, Filed September 5, 1980
-Method for obtaining a stigmasterol enriched product from deodorizer distillate Charles A. McCombs, Tommy L. Tackett, Filed May 13, 1991
-Nutritive water soluble glycerol esters of hydroxy butyric acid Charles A. McCombs, Ronald H. Birkhahn, Robert J. Clemens, Filed June 6, 1995
-Process for preparing 21-lower alkoxyoxalylprogesterones Charles A. McCombs, Filed March 2, 1981
-Nutritive glycerol esters of .beta.-acyloxy butyrates Charles A. McCombs, Ronald H. Birkhahn, Robert J. Clemens, John C. Hubbs, Filed May 3, 1995
-Enteral formula or nutritional supplement containing arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acids Charles A. McCombs, Terrence B. Mazer, Robert A. Miller, Scott D. Barnicki, James C. Phillips, Charles E. Sumner, Jr., Filed January 26, 1996
-Polyunsaturated fatty acids and fatty acid esters free of sterols and phosphorous compunds Charles A. McCombs, Robert A. Miller, Terrence B. Mazer, Filed January 26, 1996
-Preparation of 3-buten-1-ol from 3,4-epoxy-1-butene Charles A. McCombs, Filed January 20, 1998