Creation/Evolution Debate: Which Model Fits The Observed Data Best? Bruce Malone vs Jon Cleland-Host

Jon Cleland-Host has a Ph.D. in materials science from Northwestern University and has taught chemistry, physics and biology as an adjunct Professor at Saginaw Valley State University, while being a research scientist in the semiconductor/solar panel field with several patents and peer-reviewed publications for Dow Corning. He is a lay leader for the unitarian Universalist Church and is a vocal proponent for keeping the evidence for creation out of our public school system.

Bruce Malone has a degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and has worked as a Research Leader for Dow Chemical for 28 years. He has developed new products for the company resulting in 18 issued patents. Bruce has also authored/published 4 books on the evidence for creation with over 100,000 copies in print, and currently directs Search For The Truth Ministries.

One would think that if the facts of science supported evolution as the correct explanation for our existence, a well-read sixth grader could make a fool of anyone trying to explain our origin by any other possibility. Judge for yourself which viewpoint is better supported by the scientific evidence as a vocal proponents of two very different viewpoints "duke it out" in a standing room only public debate.