Creation/Evolution Debate: Which Model Fits The Observed Data Best? Bruce Malone vs Jon Cleland-Host

Jon Cleland-Host has a Ph.D. in materials science from Northwestern University and has taught chemistry, physics and biology as an adjunct Professor at Saginaw Valley State University, while being a research scientist in the semiconductor/solar panel field with several patents and peer-reviewed publications for Dow Corning. He is a lay leader for the unitarian Universalist Church and is a vocal proponent for keeping the evidence for creation out of our public school system.

Bruce Malone has a degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and has worked as a Research Leader for Dow Chemical for 28 years. He has developed new products for the company resulting in 18 issued patents. Bruce has also authored/published 4 books on the evidence for creation with over 100,000 copies in print, and currently directs Search For The Truth Ministries - http://SearchForTheTruth.net

One would think that if the facts of science supported evolution as the correct explanation for our existence, a well-read sixth grader could make a fool of anyone trying to explain our origin by any other possibility. Judge for yourself which viewpoint is better supported by the scientific evidence as a vocal proponents of two very different viewpoints "duke it out" in a standing room only public debate.